Mobileread
Jetbook feedback after a week
#1  artifact 02-08-2009, 10:43 AM
I've had my Jetbook a week now and its going back to the store :P. The reason for the return is screen funkiness -- about 20% of the time the LCD screen 'wiggles'. I'm suspecting it may be a heat issue as I had the black reader in the Caribbean and it seemed to mostly be peak heat times that this occurred. I'm going to switch to an e-ink device (probably the Kindle 2). The wiggles make me very, very wary of the long term survivability of the screen -- especially for anyone in a hot climate. Even now that I'm back to a more temperate climate don't trust the longevity of the device.

Overall impressions:
1) I settled on it expecting the rumored future MOBI and ePUB support.
2) It was cheap ($190) compared to the others (from Frys).
3) Font selection was perfectly fine for me. I stuck with 16 or 18pt. It automatically opens the first time per book at 20pt -- some global for this would be handy.
4) Smart wrapping of some sort which strips leading an trailing spaces would have been nice (for justified books). I'm not sure if this is an issue with all Readers.
5) PDF reading is a pain -- mostly for the scrolling needed when its in a readable font and having to hit right arrow/left arrow once space at a time. Line end/line start would be better or smart calculation of characters per screen the best.
6) The landscape/portrait option was nice but I never used it beyond playing with PDFs.
7) Smart font translation would be another handy feature. I was using txt files converted from other formats that'd sometimes still have ASCII character codes in them.
8) I read it for hours at a time at the beach, on the plane, on the deck of the hotel and didn't notice any eye strain. I did get some squinting in direct sunlight types of things but I'm sure that'd be the same with any Reader. I think I read 5 novels read in 7 days so it wasn't lite reading.
9) The fonts 'bleed' more than I'd like. Its LCD, there is no reason edges can't be crisp.
10) I did occasionally wish for better lighting at times but a booklight would fix that issue.
11) The low battery message would pop up every so often when it was 1/3 full which was an annoyance even though it kept going for a long time (seemed like hours) after the nagging started. The battery meter tells me its 1/3 full, I don't need pop ups reminding me and interrupting my reading until its about to go critical.
12) 11 could be fixed with a finer line in the battery meter instead of just thirds.

I didn't use the MP3 player or other options. It was just to read books.

artifact
Reply 

#2  Gideon 02-08-2009, 01:36 PM
I used my Kindle daily while in Mexico over the summer - didn't have a single problem (and it was HOT for about half of it). And of course, our summers get into the 100's here.

It may be something with the Jet itself and not related to eInk tech itself.
Reply 

#3  Kris777 02-08-2009, 09:49 PM
I have no any problems with jetBook screen when I used it in Florida last year. It was really hot but unit worked perfect.
Reply 

#4  bill_mchale 02-10-2009, 04:04 PM
Just a couple of thoughts...

Quote artifact
Overall impressions:
5) PDF reading is a pain -- mostly for the scrolling needed when its in a readable font and having to hit right arrow/left arrow once space at a time. Line end/line start would be better or smart calculation of characters per screen the best.
PDF's are pretty much a pain on any reader (even assuming they support them). Ultimately the only solution is if a reader properly supports reflowable PDFs. That being said, my personal impression of PDFs is that scrolling at least worked faster than in eInk where the screen refresh times are slower.

Quote

7) Smart font translation would be another handy feature. I was using txt files converted from other formats that'd sometimes still have ASCII character codes in them.
Actually, the problem is that the character codes you see represent characters that are not available in ASCII (which is why they show up on the screen). The fault lies with the conversion program, not the ASCII reader. My general solution is that if I convert books into another format, it is generally custom sized PDFs (as such the scrolling issue doesn't exist).

Alternately, it is not hard to map out a conversion of the encodings to alternate ascii characters (Generally the most common one is the medium length '-' which I generaly replace with --.).

Quote

9) The fonts 'bleed' more than I'd like. Its LCD, there is no reason edges can't be crisp.
Actually I wonder if you might have gotten a bumb screen on your reader. The experience of most Jetbook owners is that the screen is very sharp in comparison to e-ink screens.



--
Bill
Reply 

#5  akira28 02-10-2009, 09:54 PM
Quote bill_mchale
Actually I wonder if you might have gotten a bumb screen on your reader. The experience of most Jetbook owners is that the screen is very sharp in comparison to e-ink screens.
--
Bill
I was looking at the Jetbook tonight. The font (arial) on the display model was also blotchy, but still very readable. That would not stop me from buying one. Interesting to note that the text had better contrast than the Sony 505. Just one thing though, I could not figure out how to change the font style. Arial is so horrible.

My overall impression was very positive for the hardware. I was very surprised how it stood up against the e-ink display. The most important and critical advantage it has over the Sony's is the page refresh (turn) speed. I would buy the Jetbook in a minute if it had better support for other, established formats such as eReader or Mobipocket. As it is, it's really limited to just .txt files, so I will have to pass.
Reply 

#6  pilotbob 02-11-2009, 12:49 PM
Quote akira28
I was looking at the Jetbook tonight. The font (arial) on the display model was also blotchy, but still very readable. That would not stop me from buying one. Interesting to note that the text had better contrast than the Sony 505. Just one thing though, I could not figure out how to change the font style. Arial is so horrible.
Yes, the Helvetica looks much better on the Jetbook. Been a while since I had this device so I don't remember how to change it.

BOb
Reply 

#7  bill_mchale 02-11-2009, 02:35 PM
Quote akira28
I was looking at the Jetbook tonight. The font (arial) on the display model was also blotchy, but still very readable. That would not stop me from buying one. Interesting to note that the text had better contrast than the Sony 505. Just one thing though, I could not figure out how to change the font style. Arial is so horrible.

My overall impression was very positive for the hardware. I was very surprised how it stood up against the e-ink display. The most important and critical advantage it has over the Sony's is the page refresh (turn) speed. I would buy the Jetbook in a minute if it had better support for other, established formats such as eReader or Mobipocket. As it is, it's really limited to just .txt files, so I will have to pass.
If you play around with the options, (I can't remember specifically how) you can change the fonts. I hear you about the .txt files... but since when I convert books from other sources, I tend to convert to jetbook sized pdfs.. so I put the font I want in the pdf.. it works great .

--
Bill
Reply 

#8  akira28 02-11-2009, 08:49 PM
OK I figured it out. One must keep hitting the back button to get to the main menu. There you will find a settings tab that contains the font style choice. However, there are only two choices: Verdana and Arial, which are too similar to be considered more than one, and neither are suitable, in my eyes, as a reading font. Another strike against the Jetbook.
Reply 

#9  pilotbob 02-11-2009, 08:52 PM
Quote akira28
OK I figured it out. One must keep hitting the back button to get to the main menu. There you will find a settings tab that contains the font style choice. However, there are only two choices: Verdana and Arial, which are too similar to be considered more than one, and neither are suitable, in my eyes, as a reading font. Another strike against the Jetbook.
Actually it was Verdana I was thinking of... it looks much better on the Jetbook than Arial. No they are not the same font.

BOb
Reply 

#10  Kris777 02-11-2009, 10:58 PM
Quote pilotbob
Actually it was Verdana I was thinking of... it looks much better on the Jetbook than Arial. No they are not the same font.

BOb
Yes, I use Veranda and like it more than Arial too.
Reply 

  Next »  Last »  (1/2)
Today's Posts | Search this Thread | Login | Register